> On 7/13/23 23:59, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > +1 for postponing. We have hit issues preparing CI environment via > ansible and applying workarounds to make dnf5 work is imho not the way > to go with such core tool. It should be there as opt-in so it can get > tested but not default. The problem is that ansible uses a different release cycle then Fedora. DNF5 is already in Fedora 38 and not only for testing, but also as a replacement of microdnf. Please check the list of reported issue and you will find that a lot of issues are currently resolved. Jaroslav _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
