Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:40 AM Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
> 
> Except dnf5 broke a number of microdnf usecases with low memory where
> microdnf worked [1].
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214520

Correct but as you can see the issue was not in DNF5 but in libsolv (solver for DNF, DNF5, zypper, PackageKit). Ales Matej from DNF team prepared two patches - one to resolve the issue in libsolv and second to enable workaround for DNF5. Thanks to better DNF5 structure we were able to discover the real cause of the issue.

Therefore I am curios why the issue is mentioned here?

Best regards

Jaroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux