On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:08:29AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > It was probably a mistake to say "Fedora 40 and onward" will use > Discourse for Change discussions, as it assumes success (which I don't > want to assume after many experiences in the past proving otherwise). > I would have preferred the trial limiting to just Fedora 40 and > reviewing it afterward. But we can also just force that review after > Fedora 40's development window closes anyway. It's phrased this way so that we don't automatically revert to status quo ante without further action. But implicitly, the possiblity of review and changing of the decision is always there. This is as with any other decision: we decide "for ever", but in fact we can revisit a decision at some later point. > As it currently stands, this is a *trial* to see how it goes. If we > get crickets or low-quality discussion there, we'll put it back and > hopefully this won't come up again for another five years. :) Yes, that is a possibility. > But if it works out... Well, we'll see. Yes, we should be able to have a discussion more grounded in facts half a year from now. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
