Josh Boyer wrote: > I want to make sure I understand that statement. You're saying you > will actively walk away from Fedora because you would have to change > the manner in which you discuss things? I am saying I and many other existing contributors may or may not walk away from Fedora entirely, and even if not, may reduce our interaction with Fedora, due to being forced to use a discussion tool that does not support our workflows. Heck, it does not even work in my browser (Falkon) without ugly workarounds. (https://discuss.kde.org/t/discuss-kde-org-cannot-be-accessed-by-konqueror/548) > That's certainly a choice one could make. Personally, I would not > prioritize keeping my bespoke email setup intact over working with a > community on a project I care about. If there's even a remote > possibility moving to Discourse will attract more contributors to > Fedora then I'd happily learn how to deal with it. Change is > difficult, but in the end it's something we're all capable of. I do not understand this double standard: You and several others are expecting new contributors to walk away from Fedora due to the manner in which we discuss things, but in the same time act surprised when warned that existing contributors are likely to do exactly that. In fact, we have much more reason to do so because the new workflow is a regression, and forcing it on us over our objections actively tells us we are no longer welcome. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
