On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 4:19 AM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > There is no problem technically; the Copr repo[2] is building > > > Firecracker RPMs with musl. Maintainers of both Rust and musl seemed > > > to be against it in Fedora. From this thread: > > Why does Fedora not want to ship Firecracker statically linked to musl? > > That is the supported and tested configuration upstream. Using glibc > > or dynamic linking is not supported for production use. > > Because glibc is Fedora's supported libc implementation and supporting > two different implementations at the same time is complex And importantly, as the musl maintainer, I recommended against it. We should take the opportunity to engage with upstream to fully support glibc instead. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
