Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:37 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On one hand, I think the script should consider commits like this:
>
> """
> Modernize packaging
>
> Remove deprecated macros
> Verify license is SPDX
> Drop Fedora 28 conditionals
> """
>
> On the other hand, I consider putting "Verified that License tag is valid
> SPDX." into a commit with "Use the %gap_arches macro." in the subject chaotic evil.

I don't see how the example above is qualitatively different from the
example I posted.  Mine was also changing an obsolete usage to a
modern one and verifying the license is SPDX.  Why do you think the
two are different?

In any case, as a precaution, I will refrain from playing paladin
characters until this issue is resolved.
-- 
Jerry "Insert evil cackle here" James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux