Re: SPDX Statistics - University of Constantinople edition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 27. 02. 23 v 23:41 Jerry James napsal(a):
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 3:35 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
List by package maintainers is here

   https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt
That shows some packages under my name, such as gap-pkg-ace, where I
pushed git commits mentioning SPDX a couple of weeks ago.  Did I do it
incorrectly?

https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt

say:

gap-pkg-ace warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check

When I check 
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gap-pkg-ace/blob/rawhide/f/gap-pkg-ace.spec
I see no mention in spec %changelog
and when I check the git-log
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gap-pkg-ace/commits/rawhide
I see no mention of spdx neither.

Is it possible that you forgot to git-push?

Miroslav

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux