Re: Inactive packager check for F38

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 17/02/23 17:14, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 1:48 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> During the weekend I can write down a script reusing partial code from
>> the find_inactive_packagers script and purge the ticket list from users
>> that showed activity in RH bugzilla, let me know if you want me to
>> proceed. Or I can provide a list of users, but I think that will be a
>> long list for manual processing...
> People who were active in Bugzilla will get noticed on the step-two
> run and not removed, so I don't think it's necessary to go through and
> clean those up now unless you really want to.
>
Yeah, I agree it is not mandatory to purge those tickets before
step-two, but not doing so will cause check-impact to output a lot of
garbage and to cause false alarms to packagers.

Mattia

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux