Il 16/02/23 20:26, Mattia Verga ha scritto: > Il 16/02/23 18:36, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:04:01AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 6:29 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I'm a little surprised that the pagure ticket doesn't have the >>>> maintainer to whom it refers added as a subscriber to the ticket. >>> As far as I know, you can't subscribe others to a ticket the way you >>> can add a CC in Bugzilla. We could modify the script to set the person >>> as the assignee, but >>> >>> 1. That's functionally the same as @ing them in the ticket >>> and... >>> >>>> Does pagure.io not have accounts synced for everyone who is a >>>> Fedora packager ? >>> ...2. Not as far as I know. If the person never logged in (which you >>> don't necessarily need to do as a packager), then pagure.io would not >>> know about them. I see that from time to time with Changes tickets to >>> FESCo. >> pagure.io only creates user accounts after the initial login. >> There's no syncing of anything. pagure.io is intended to be a general >> source forge and not fedora specific. >> >> I'm not sure there's any easy way around this. I suppose the best would >> be to identify all those users who don't exist on pagure.io that are >> cced in the tickets and email a copy of the ticket or link to it to >> their @fedoraproject.org alias. >> > Ah, that's indeed a bad design from my side, I didn't take into account > that users of src.fp.o are not the same of users of pagure.io. > > Flagging unknown users in pagure.io should be quite simple, but then we > have to decide how to handle them. Direct emails are not the best > option, but the only alternative it come to my mind is to use Bugzilla > instead of pagure.io to open and manage inactive_packagers tickets. > I've pushed https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/pull-request/1440 which will add an extra column to the csv file to mark users not found in pagure.io. However, I think something wrong has happened with the last policy run: I was surprised that so many tickets were filed and my suspects are that the check against bugzilla hasn't been properly performed. For example: ``` $ python find_inactive_packagers.py check-user mhorky Checking mhorky activity in Pagure... No activity detected for user mhorky in https://src.fedoraproject.org User not found in https://pagure.io Checking mhorky activity in Bodhi... Checking mhorky activity in mailing lists... Checking mhorky activity in bugzilla... Using RHBugzilla for URL containing .redhat.com User mhorky made a comment in Bugzilla on 2022_05_31. Activity detected for user mhorky. ``` This user should not have been detected as inactive if the Bugzilla check was run. @Ben, maybe you forgot to set the BZ_API_KEY before running the script? Mattia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
