On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 3:45 PM Mattia Verga via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This user should not have been detected as inactive if the Bugzilla > check was run. @Ben, maybe you forgot to set the BZ_API_KEY before > running the script? I didn't forget, I intentionally did not. I thought we had already modified the script to use `~/.bugzillarc` via the python-bugzilla library (the scripts for processing Change proposals and handling branch/EOL events does this). But apparently we did not, since https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issue/5 is still open. I'll prioritize that for next week if the COVID brain fog has lifted by then. I did find it suspicious that the mailing list and Bugzilla count matched exactly, but ...again... brain fog. I'll also knock out #6 (which is #5 except for the Pagure API key) at the same time. This will make the SOP for future me and my successors easier to follow. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
