On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 5:06 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:00:22AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > No, that's the promise of Fedora Flatpaks, which is an effort with a > > distinct identity and philosophy (but which is, uh, not being its best > > possible self so far, I think everyone would agree). It's not the > > Joining this discussion late (I plead "FOSDEM"), but I want to chime in on > this -- I do agree, and think that making that better should be a focus. > > Not only will this make things better on Fedora Silverblue (and others), but > it also is a way we can expand our reach -- we can bring the benefits of > distro packaging (with, you know, guidelines and policies and transparency > and so on) to people who might be running a different distro underneath. > > (And then hopefully coax them over entirely. I mean, if they want. No > pressure.) > I already know of a couple of distros considering using Fedora Flatpaks over Flathub for three reasons: 1. All OSS 2. Transparent build 3. Multi-arch -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
