Vít Ondruch píše v St 25. 01. 2023 v 18:01 +0100: > > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this > > > particular case, > > > but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unfortunate :/ > > Can you elaborate on why you feel that way? > > > I don't trust upstream Flatpacks. I don't trust they follow any > standard > except standard of their authors. I maintain both packages in Fedora and flatpaks on Flathub, so I can compare. The review to get an app to Flathub was as thorough as Fedora package review. In some ways even stricter. It's not like "it builds, it runs, you're good to go". They care about some standards, about builds being verifiable etc. The Flathub CI seems to be more extensive than what we have in Fedora. > And I don't like Flatpacks, because their main advantage (their > isolation) is also their biggest disadvantage. There can't be both > without making compromises. If I am not mistaken, the isolation is > also > mostly myth, because it is disabled in most cases. Why? Apps come with permissions they require (which you can override btw). Just because some apps require access to your whole filesystem doesn't mean the isolation is a myth. You know the permissions, you may decide not to use such an app. None of the flatpaks maintained by me require this kind of access and are well isolated. Jiri _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
