Re: Retiring Bottles in favor of Flatpak provided by upstream

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 15:49 +0000, Patrick Griffis via devel wrote:
> > IMHO, retiring a Fedora package in favor of an upstream binary of
> > whatever 
> > kind (Flatpak, Snap, AppImage, RPM, binary tarball, whatever) is a
> > major 
> > disservice to Fedora users and defeats the whole point of having a 
> > distribution to begin with.
> 
> How is an orphan package a good service to users? It will just become
> outdated and degrade over time. I think it is far more responsible,
> and respectful of users, to accept that some packages are better
> maintained elsewhere.

Orphaned packages get automatically retired after a short period of
time if nobody adopts them. So orphaning is a courtesy to give someone
else a *chance* to adopt the package; if nobody does, it'll then get
retired without you having to do anything extra.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux