Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > That description assumes that FESCo members are preschoolers who are > easy to trick and also need to be reminded who said what every day. > That's certainly not the case. The objections against the proposal > were made very clearly and they certainly weren't forgotten over a few > days. Those objections also didn't *change* over those few days, so > repeating them wouldn't actually change anything. The objections did change because the arguments brought up by the other side did. I already pointed that out once. I do not want to sound like a broken record, so instead of a copy&paste, here is the link: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/CJ2P37D56LEDFKCZSBZ5LDSD53KH662B/ Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
