On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 3:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Exactly, you're just confirming what I wrote above. > > A "vote being rigged" means that either the people who should be allowed to vote > couldn't, or that people who are not allowed to vote did, or that voters were > tricked or forced to vote differently, or that votes were miscounted. What's being alleged is that many members were tricked into changing their vote by using the false narrative about _FORTIFY_SOURCE proposal getting an unfair pass despite performance concerns (which *I* hypothesized months ago and I later dispelled, in the end even quoting benchmark results for it) and creating the impression that the toolchain team is being duplicitous about the performance question. Further trickery involved rushing the vote, claiming that it had to be done soon to meet the mass rebuild deadline; too bad if those who had strong objections earlier weren't around to put their comments on record. In that context the vote could in fact be considered rigged. If the voting members could come out and clarify exactly why they changed their vote, it would make things a lot clearer. Sid _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
