Simo Sorce wrote:
> Soname breakage should not happen in stable releases...
There are exceptions, including but not limited to security updates, which
is relevant for Lua.
> liblua should be rebuilt to provide the older so name and if not
> possible with the new code, reverted back via epoch change or some
> patching
Providing the older soname is not possible with the new code. The way the
old package worked is that it actually contained both Lua 5.3 and Lua 5.4,
i.e., two completely different source trees, and the 5.3 sources were
unmaintained and insecure.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
