On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 20:29 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > lua-5.4.4-4.fc37 in F37 release provides both: > > liblua-5.3.so()(64bit) > liblua-5.4.so()(64bit) > > aka both of: > > /usr/lib64/liblua-5.3.so > /usr/lib64/liblua-5.4.so > > but the recent update to lua-libs-5.4.4-7.fc37 only provides: > > liblua-5.4.so()(64bit) > /usr/lib64/liblua-5.4.so > > And the same appears to be happening in F36 (I did not check): > > This is causing the following fails to install cegui bugs: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156354 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156356 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156626 > > and the following fails to install megaglest bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156357 > > I can rebuild cegui (and issue updates of it for f36 + f37), > which I think might be easier/better then restoring the > liblua compat build. > > And I guess I can also take care of megaglest while at it, > but first I wanted to make sure that this is the right > way to move forward with fixing this... ? Soname breakage should not happen in stable releases... liblua should be rebuilt to provide the older so name and if not possible with the new code, reverted back via epoch change or some patching -- Simo Sorce RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
