Hi Philip, I added a Ruby SiG mailing list to TO. Folks at Ruby SiG, Could you take a look at the message below? Philip is trying to create a RPM package including WASM built Ruby binaries. Your feedback is helpful. On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:00 AM Philip Rhoades <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jun, > > > On 2023-01-09 00:36, Jun Aruga (he / him) wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 11:51 AM Philip Rhoades via devel > > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> People, > >> > >> Over the holidays we had our irregular Family Lightning Chess > >> competition (10 seconds per move) - I have not found an online web > >> site > >> that will work exactly with our rules and it occurs to me that this > >> would be a nice project for me to get working via a Ruby2WASM project. > >> If I could get that project working, it would allow the family to have > >> at least annual electronic competitions for the times when not all the > >> relatives can physically make it to the one place at the one time . . > >> > >> What do you think? > > > > Good idea! > > > Good! - I wasn't sure if it was or note . . > > > > Ruby 3.2 released a few weeks ago, started to support the WASM built > > feature, and I guess that people want to use it easily. > > > I certainly do! > > > > The first choice for the packaging is to create WASM built binaries as > > a sub package of "ruby" https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby or to > > create a new package with the new RPM spec file. > > > I don't know about that but it would be good for me to get started with > a "Hello World!" Ruby2WASM app and go from there . . OK. I think trying to create a minimal RPM package such as "Hello World" is a good idea if you have never experienced RPM packaging. Then as your next step, you may be able to try to build by creating your package by copying the current rpms/ruby's ruby.spec to e.g. ruby-wasm.spec, and modifying it to build WASM binaries. Tutorial: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_GNU_Hello/ Packaging Guide: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > We discussed if we shipped WASM binaries a bit in the ruby-sig@ > > mailing list. I can recommend you to join the list to discuss people > > in the ruby related packages if you like. > > > > * Ruby 3.2 - ruby-sig@ > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/FK3XRKUICBS7HFZVEENSEGJ4ZMKCVNWF/ > > > Yes, I read that stuff and am subscribed to that list now. OK. Nice! > > Fedora WASM SIP might be launched. You can check the situation. > > > > * Web Assembly on Fedora: interested in a Fedora SIG to work on this? > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/JO2YYDQPC65EMQVO6UCHDV4SAKQNSGKV/ > > > Happy to join that list too but that is a much wider deal than the > Ruby2WASM project? Yes. right. I think it's about WASM things more than Ruby. For example, it's about what you need to do to build WASM binaries of Ruby, and which dependency RPM packages you need. > Thanks! > > Phil. > -- > Philip Rhoades > > PO Box 896 > Cowra NSW 2794 > Australia > E-mail: phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Thanks too! -- Jun | He - Him | Timezone: UTC+1 or 2, Czech Republic See <https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/czech-republic-prague-to-utc> for the timezone. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
