Dan Horák kirjoitti 3.1.2023 klo 15.23:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:14:04 -0500
Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Could you please elucidate why the command that people have used for nearly
30 years and is the most documented on how to build rpms is broken? And how
people should use instead when they may be dealing with an environment
which doesn't allow fedpkg to work? [AKA I am working on a package which I
want to submit for review so I need to build a @$@$% src RPM somehow and I
am being told I can't use the built in command to do so]
I wonder whether we should start recommending "rpkg" instead of plain
"rpmbuild" for the initial/non-dist-git work on rpms ... I am finding it
quite useful/powerful.
Perhaps we have other places that still recommend rpmbuild for this, but
at least our "GNU Hello" packaging tutorial [1] currently uses fedpkg
for this.
The instructions given in the tutorial do work. Unlike Stephen implies,
fedpkg can be used outside of Git repository for this and other tasks.
This Change will make that tutorial use also rpmautospec. I have a pull
request ready for that [2].
[1]:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_GNU_Hello/
[2]: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/102
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
