On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 8:24 AM Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 08:14:04 -0500 > Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 04:20, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > > > On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > - fedpkg mockbuild > > > > > > > > But it doesn't work correctly (will always use Release: 1) if you run > > > > "rpmbuild -bs foo-bar.spec" which is a very common scenario. > > > > > > "Doctor, it hurts when I do that." > > > > > > 'rpmbuild -bs' is broken. Don't use it. > > > > > > > > Could you please elucidate why the command that people have used for nearly > > 30 years and is the most documented on how to build rpms is broken? And how > > people should use instead when they may be dealing with an environment > > which doesn't allow fedpkg to work? [AKA I am working on a package which I > > want to submit for review so I need to build a @$@$% src RPM somehow and I > > am being told I can't use the built in command to do so] > > I wonder whether we should start recommending "rpkg" instead of plain > "rpmbuild" for the initial/non-dist-git work on rpms ... I am finding it > quite useful/powerful. > As I understand it, rpkg is not maintained, so that would be a poor choice. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
