Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:

> On 30/12/2022 20:01, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
>> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
>> by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
>
> -1 until these known issues[1] are fixed, especially with changelogs
>  and using rpmautospec in COPR or mock.
>
> [1]:
> https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/peculiarities.html#known-constraints

The page doesnt discuss COPR/mock?

COPR seems to work in some cases, specifically with the dist-git build
(but not just building from dist-git).

A quick check suggests that rpmautospec does the right thing and
produces a portable source RPM that doesn't depend on rpmautospec
anymore.  As a result, the compatibility impact won't be too severe, I
hope.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux