On Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 03:10:22PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Vitaly Zaitsev via devel: > > > On 30/12/2022 20:01, Ben Cotton wrote: > >> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > >> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > >> community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved > >> by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee. > > > > -1 until these known issues[1] are fixed, especially with changelogs > > and using rpmautospec in COPR or mock. > > > > [1]: > > https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/peculiarities.html#known-constraints > > The page doesnt discuss COPR/mock? > > COPR seems to work in some cases, specifically with the dist-git build > (but not just building from dist-git). > > A quick check suggests that rpmautospec does the right thing and > produces a portable source RPM that doesn't depend on rpmautospec > anymore. As a result, the compatibility impact won't be too severe, I > hope. Also mock builds seem fine. I tested this now on F37 with a few different scenarios: - fedpkg mockbuild - git commit --allow-empty -m Rebuild && fedpkg mockbuild - fedpkg srpm && mock *.src.rpm seem to generate the expected versions numbers and changelogs. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
