Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:13 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:32:58AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 02/01/2023 21:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > - fedpkg mockbuild
>
> But it doesn't work correctly (will always use Release: 1) if you run
> "rpmbuild -bs foo-bar.spec" which is a very common scenario.

"Doctor, it hurts when I do that."

'rpmbuild -bs' is broken. Don't use it.

Yes, I would say that as well. It's just a low level tool and can never have all the integration with git that fedpkg has.

We might need to update package maintainer documents to be clear about this though, so that people know that they should use 'fedpkg srpm' and not 'rpmbuild -bs'.

-- 
Kalev
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux