Re: Copr delete-by-default expiration policy still unacceptable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Boyer wrote:
> Would you be willing to pay for that feature?

Probably not, because at that point, it would probably be cheaper to just 
set up a mirror or even a full-fledged build system on a VPS somewhere. Or 
even to use OBS, though I do not know what their retention policies for old 
repositories are (i.e., whether they are any better or even worse).

What makes Copr so interesting is that it is offered at no cost to all 
Fedora contributors. But it has always been treated as an unloved stepchild 
by Red Hat and has never received the kind of resources, e.g., OBS has. 
Though it is still better than what smaller distributions like Arch are able 
to offer, where, e.g., the AUR only allows publishing the source PKGBUILD 
files and no binaries at all.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux