Re: Copr delete-by-default expiration policy still unacceptable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 13/10/22 16:48, Kevin Kofler via devel ha scritto:
>
> What makes Copr so interesting is that it is offered at no cost to all
> Fedora contributors. But it has always been treated as an unloved stepchild
> by Red Hat and has never received the kind of resources, e.g., OBS has.

Is there any chance Fedora can put some money for that? Who is
responsible for spending Fedora resources? Looking at the Fedora budget
summaries [0] (latest available is for 2020...) Fedora always closes
years spending only 50% of the available budget... can't we put some
money on technical stuff needed by the platform instead of always rely
on RH?

[0] https://budget.fedoraproject.org/budget/docs/index.html

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux