Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/09/2022 00:01, Adam Williamson wrote:
But yeah, looking at that, one 'loophole' is it doesn't check if
they're actually needing*proven*  packager powers - just packager
powers. If a proven packager is only building packages they have
explicit commit rights to, they may not need proven packager powers any
more?

According to Fedora Provenpackager policy, proven packagers should only use their powers during approved bulk changes, rebuilding dependent packages, etc.

It's fine that they didn't change other packages during the reporting period.

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux