Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 12:24:11PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> So, I have a probably-controversial idea for a follow-up on this.
> 
> Even after this sweep, we have 141 proven packagers. That's a lot of
> people who can build almost anything in Fedora.
> 
> It should be possible to check whether a provenpackager has built any
> package they don't have direct commit rights to in the last X months.
> 
> Should we construct that search, run it, and propose removing
> provenpackager status from folks who aren't using it, to cut down that
> set?

That policy was setup before this one for packagers. ;) 

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux