On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 17:28 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive > Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive > have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after > the F37 final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed > from the packager group. (Note that pagure.io is one of the systems > checked for activity, so commenting on your ticket that you're still > around will prevent you from showing up in the second round.) So, I have a probably-controversial idea for a follow-up on this. Even after this sweep, we have 141 proven packagers. That's a lot of people who can build almost anything in Fedora. It should be possible to check whether a provenpackager has built any package they don't have direct commit rights to in the last X months. Should we construct that search, run it, and propose removing provenpackager status from folks who aren't using it, to cut down that set? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
