Il 04/09/22 00:01, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > On Sat, 2022-09-03 at 13:04 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 12:24:11PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> So, I have a probably-controversial idea for a follow-up on this. >>> >>> Even after this sweep, we have 141 proven packagers. That's a lot of >>> people who can build almost anything in Fedora. >>> >>> It should be possible to check whether a provenpackager has built any >>> package they don't have direct commit rights to in the last X months. >>> >>> Should we construct that search, run it, and propose removing >>> provenpackager status from folks who aren't using it, to cut down that >>> set? >> That policy was setup before this one for packagers. ;) >> >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/ > Look, I'm getting old, okay? ;) > > But yeah, looking at that, one 'loophole' is it doesn't check if > they're actually needing *proven* packager powers - just packager > powers. If a proven packager is only building packages they have > explicit commit rights to, they may not need proven packager powers any > more? I sometimes use my PP powers to fix build tagging issues / updates flows caused by Bodhi glitches, but I (very) rarely use them to build someone else package. What I mean is whatever test is done to check if someone needs to be PP doesn't assume the power is just used to build packages. Mattia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
