On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 03:54 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 09:18:54PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > None of this precludes the use of nautilus-open-terminal. You haven't > > responded to the more relevant and important part of my post, which is > > about getting nautilus-open-terminal included as part of a new package > > combination, say for power users. > > I did, but probably in other responses to other folks. I think the idea > of a package to add such an IMHO essential triviality back to GNOME > is like asking for people to shop again for the gear shift handle after > buying a new car. It's just completely over the top, IMHO. Not that I could see from the rest of this thread. New and possibly better ways of organizing and exposing Extras packages are being discussed on fedora-extras-list. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
