Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via
devel napsal(a):
Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS, which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about module lifecycles? What is it about *lifecycles* that's important, anyway? Don't we maybe want to just have a sort of generic system for "important events"?I view it as a mechanism to communicate well in advance of when someone is going to have to do work. Fedora is the simple case: every 6-12 months you're going to have to upgrade the version of the OS.
And when implementing this for Fedora, can you bear RHEL in mind too? Because it has several levels of EOL
https://endoflife.software/operating-systems/linux/red-hat-enterprise-linux-rhel
Miroslav
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
