Re: proposal idea: EOL notifications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 12:34 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
>
> Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
> which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about
> module lifecycles? What is it about *lifecycles* that's important,
> anyway? Don't we maybe want to just have a sort of generic system for
> "important events"?
>
> I view it as a mechanism to communicate well in advance of when someone
> is going to have to do work.
>
> Fedora is the simple case: every 6-12 months you're going to have to
> upgrade the version of the OS.
>
> And when implementing this for Fedora, can you bear RHEL in mind too? Because it has several levels of EOL
>
> https://endoflife.software/operating-systems/linux/red-hat-enterprise-linux-rhel

RHEL is already implementing it's own scheme for lifecycle metadata.

josh
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux