Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/7/22 10:46, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> 
> ngompa13 wrote:
> 
>> [...]
>> I agree, this is a completely unacceptable statement to make. The
>> problem isn't sysprof, the problem is that profiling is garbage on
>> Linux by default.
> 
> That's an overstatement.
> 
>> And while maybe most developers may not bother to do profiling right
>> now, we don't know if they wouldn't if profiling tools *worked*.
> 
> You said the problem isn't sysprof.  Userspace profiling tools can fully
> unwind with dwarf / .eh-frame if they make the effort.  Several do.

The problem is that doing so has unacceptable performance.  I believe
perf actually winds up doing so offline because doing so online is too
slow.  That is why a different solution is needed, one that allows the
unwinding to happen efficiently without requiring frame pointers.
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux