On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 03:15:02PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 4:55 AM Kevin Kofler via devel < > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Daan De Meyer via devel wrote: > > > Which shows a smaller than 1% slowdown between the binary built with > > frame > > > pointers and the binary built without frame pointers. > > > > I am still strongly opposed to degrading performance and size for all > > users > > just to help the handful users of poorly-designed profiling tools. > > > > > I am coming a bit late to this discussion, but I would like to inject the > viewpoint that 'performance' (however defined) > isn't the only criterion by which we should just judge what Fedora > produces. At least for Fedora Workstation, being > a useful system for developers with working debugging and profiling tools > should have some weight too. > > And I doubt that you'd be able to notice a 'smaller than 1% slowdown' on > your system. Maybe not, but even ~1% is still an unacceptable slowdown. It would take about a year for the compiler to catch up. Marek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
