Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:43 AM Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 3:06 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> If the GNOME's sysprof does not
>> work with Fedora, fix it or use something else.  Do not change how
>> Fedora is built.
>
>
> The result of that attitude is that performance work in the desktop space is happening
> on GNOME OS images, or in Flatpak runtimes instead of on Fedora. Which is a bit
> sad for Fedora as a supposedly developer-friendly environment.
>

I agree, this is a completely unacceptable statement to make. The
problem isn't sysprof, the problem is that profiling is garbage on
Linux by default. And while maybe most developers may not bother to do
profiling right now, we don't know if they wouldn't if profiling tools
*worked*.




--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux