On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 02:39:04PM -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Michel Alexandre Salim <salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > - as I stated, there are offers to help with getting syslinux replaced > > with GRUB > > More generally, I'm concerned that folks think this'll help a lot more > than it actually will. There's a tendency to think in terms of packages > - they're contained units and therefore convenient to reason about. But > just being in a container is not an indication of complexity or size. > The obligatory example of this that is (I hope) generally understood is > the kernel. One source package, wildly different complexity than > anything else - to the point where it's more meaningful to talk about > the workflows enabled, subsystems, etc. than the rpms themselves. I've > mentioned this upthread as well, but this is the nature of the problem: > it's not about *packages*, it's about *use case*. > Right, not saying this is a viable long-term solution. But having everything being GRUB, *plus* using protective MBR, would allow us to not force people to reinstall when we finally kill off legacy BIOS. * yes, we still need to figure out how to convert existing systems to * protective MBR plus GPT, but at least we won't be creating new legacy * installs that will require reinstallation Best, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure