On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 12:38:40PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 12:15 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I agree 100%. I think this is actually getting to the crux of the > > issue, which is that while we have a lot of people that want BIOS > > support to continue, we effectively have nobody that wants to do the > > work to make it happen. > > In a previous thread about bios support, there > was a discussion about (a mythical) someone > resurrecting DUET to provide a transition path. > > To the best of my knowledge, no one stepped > up to do that work[0]. > > Gary > > > [0] Quite honestly, given that DUET was removed > upstream, I would have thought looking instead > at Clover (which is still supported) would be a > better option, but better only in some theoretical > sense, as there was no one to do that work > either. I was wondering about whether this was possible (booting UEFI from BIOS) too. For reference, DUET is described here: https://rodsbooks.com/bios2uefi/ Clover is described here: https://github.com/CloverHackyColor/CloverBootloader Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
