On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 12:15 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I agree 100%. I think this is actually getting to the crux of the > issue, which is that while we have a lot of people that want BIOS > support to continue, we effectively have nobody that wants to do the > work to make it happen. In a previous thread about bios support, there was a discussion about (a mythical) someone resurrecting DUET to provide a transition path. To the best of my knowledge, no one stepped up to do that work[0]. Gary [0] Quite honestly, given that DUET was removed upstream, I would have thought looking instead at Clover (which is still supported) would be a better option, but better only in some theoretical sense, as there was no one to do that work either. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
