On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 06:05:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:55 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > (...) > > > OK then, I can +1 that, but please: Make that more obvious in the proposal. > > Honest question: How do I do that? Do you have a suggestion? Drop this part: Stopping to run unnecessary package builds on i686 will free up no small amount of resources. In particular, stopping to build for i686 could potentially free up almost half of the existing x86 builder resources in koji. If this effort only applies to some small subset of packages, this benefit will not be there. In Detailed Description, you describe status quo, but don't say _anything_ about the proposal. Prefix the current text by: "Currently, ", and add a description of the proposal with a phrase like "only applies to the packages where maintainers see a benefit to opting out of the i686 builds". > The proposal already does not contain anything language that could be > interpreted as "this will be mandatory", explicitly says that things > can be done incrementally, and also mentions dropping the requirement > for the ExcludeArch tracker bug. > > The only thing I can imagine is that either 1) people didn't actually > read the proposal, or 2) my non-native English is confusing. > If 2) can be improved, I'm open to suggestions. If it's 1), then I > can't do anything about it. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
