Re: F37 Change: Encourage Dropping Unused / Leaf Packages on i686 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:15 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 07. 03. 22 19:30, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 7:22 PM Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Once upon a time, Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> >>> == Summary ==
> >>>
> >>> Package maintainers are encouraged to actively stop building their
> >>> packages for i686, especially if supporting this architecture requires
> >>> significant investment of time or resources, for no benefit. This will
> >>> not apply to packages which are still depended on by other i686
> >>> packages, or which get used in a "multilib" context (i.e. for running
> >>> 32-bit applications on x86_64).
> >>
> >> It's unclear what this actually means for packagers.  Should
> >> ExcludeArch: lines be added to spec files?
> >
> > Ah, yes, thanks for catching that. This was indeed my intention:
> > Packagers add "ExcludeArch: %{ix86}" to the package in question, if it
> > is safe to do so (unused / leaf packages only).
> > I forgot to add that detail to the proposal, will add it now.
> >
> > As far as I can tell, any approach more sophisticated than that (like
> > automatically determining the i686 packages we *need*) would require
> > significantly more work, and probably be more error-prone, introduce
> > more friction, and make it harder to revert errors.
>
> This begs several questions that would probably need to be clarified e.g. in
> the packaging guidelines. For example:
>
> ------
>
> I am adding a brand new package to multiple Fedora releases. The package is not
> noarch. It successfully builds on i686. What am I supposed to do?
>
>   a) build it on i686, until it fails there
>   b) excludearch %ix86 right away not to create a dead dep tree
>   c) excludearch %ix86 on F37+ only, as this is a F37 change
>
> -------
>
> I am updating a package that no longer builds on i686. How do I know if I can
> exclude it safely? What checks do I run? Am I allowed to push this update to
> stable Fedora releases?
>
> -------
>
> My package is noarch but has multiple arched dependencies. How do I properly
> make Koji not attempt to build it on i686?
>

A simpler solution would be to just default-off i686 and check-in some
marker file that indicates the package needs to be built for multilib.
This is how openSUSE does it today with the baselibs.conf file:
https://code.opensuse.org/package/fdk-aac-free/blob/master/f/baselibs.conf


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux