On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 20:32 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 8:25 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So, I'll go ahead and be a bad guy here: > > > > Perhaps it's time to just retire i686 completely? > > > > Steam is available as a flatpak, and old software thats 32bit only and > > can't be rebuilt could just be run from a f36 container? > > > > This would save us: > > > > * all the builder resources > > * all the multilib calculation time/space in composes > > > > If we don't want to retire it now, when will we? > > I have considered this option, but I don't think we can do that yet. > > For example, as far as I know, you need the 32-bit host libraries for > running 32-bit Windows applications in Wine. > Dropping that would make our Wine packages almost useless, since a > large fraction of Windows software still isn't 64-bit. > > But I could be wrong. And if we indeed don't need wine.i686 to run > 32-bit Windows apps, retiring i686 entirely would be an option, I > agree. > (I myself am using the Steam flatpak you mentioned. It works well, and > I don't need 32-bit libs on my host system at all, which is nice.) Wouldn't wine problem be solved by providing the 32bit version as a flatpak if still needed for some corner cases? Simo. -- Simo Sorce RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
