On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 04:22:42 PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro
<mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well that would be what I was missing. I guess this should be much
less controversial, then, if it's OK for people to just continue
using dist-git forever and completely ignore src-git? Nobody is ever
required to use something other than dist-git to contribute changes
to Fedora packages that use src-git? It's smart enough to not break
src-git if I commit new patches to a package via dist-git?
Hi, this is NOT how it works. There is some clarification here:
https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issue/1#comment-765283
So you really do need access to src-git in order to make arbitrary
changes to the Fedora package. And that limitation makes sense to me.
This means wherever src-git is hosted really does become part of our
critical path infrastructure.
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
