Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Neal Gompa:

> Seems like a worthy effort to me. Though instead of having branches
> for redhat-rpm-config, you could add macros to flag it on and off by
> default, and have releng configure a side-tag for you that turns it on
> for package builds (we can have macros set for build tags).

Is it possible to set a dist tag suffix for the branch, then?  In
combination with the flag approach, that would actually be more
convenient (assuming the gcc folks are okay with a conditionally applied
patch for that branch).

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux