On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:25:55 -0500 Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26 2021 at 03:06:18 PM +0200, Kalev Lember > <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I second to Fabio's request. It's not OK to drop webkitgtk secondary > > architectures without coordination. Please revert this immediately > > and do a system wide change proposal instead. The net effect of > > dropping webkitgtk is that all of GNOME packages will have to > > excludearch i686 and arm, as they are going to be unbuildable > > otherwise. > > Sigh, OK. > > Of course it will only affect the subset of packages that actually > depend on WebKitGTK, which should be much less than all of GNOME. But > yes, everything that depends on it will need to be modified, that is > true. > > We're really lucky this issue does not seem to affect F35. I wish we > knew why. there is a chance on armv7 I think + /usr/bin/cmake -S . -B redhat-linux-build '-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-O2 -g -DNDEBUG' '-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE:STRING=-O2 -g -DNDEBUG' the "-g" here IMO overrides the -g1 from the earlier flags setting Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
