Re: Considering ExcludeArch: %{ix86} for webkit2gtk3 (and now also ExcludeArch: %{arm}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 26 2021 at 03:06:18 PM +0200, Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I second to Fabio's request. It's not OK to drop webkitgtk secondary architectures without coordination. Please revert this immediately and do a system wide change proposal instead. The net effect of dropping webkitgtk is that all of GNOME packages will have to excludearch i686 and arm, as they are going to be unbuildable otherwise.

Sigh, OK.

Of course it will only affect the subset of packages that actually depend on WebKitGTK, which should be much less than all of GNOME. But yes, everything that depends on it will need to be modified, that is true.

We're really lucky this issue does not seem to affect F35. I wish we knew why.

Michael

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux