Re: I think we should stop building i686 packages we're not shipping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 01 September 2021 at 10:01, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 31/08/2021 18:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
> > build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
> > This seems like a waste of resources and time.
> 
> +1. We should only build selected packages for multilib support (Steam,
> Wine).

That's not enough. As mentioned elsewhere in the thread, we need the
whole build environment built for i686, including all BuildRequires:.

Also, there are tons of old closed-source i686-only games that depend on
i686 libraries other than Wine or Steam.

Regards,
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
        -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux