On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 10:47:05AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Wednesday, 01 September 2021 at 10:01, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 31/08/2021 18:53, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we > > > build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it. > > > This seems like a waste of resources and time. > > > > +1. We should only build selected packages for multilib support (Steam, > > Wine). > > That's not enough. As mentioned elsewhere in the thread, we need the > whole build environment built for i686, including all BuildRequires:. That is probably still a small number of packages compared to the complete fedora package set. So I'd expect "give koji a whitelist" will work better than "blacklist in specfiles". > Also, there are tons of old closed-source i686-only games that depend on > i686 libraries other than Wine or Steam. That should be a rather small set of packages too, probably not much beyond SDL and maybe mesa for the newer ones. Anything which does *not* go that route to display stuff and tries to talk directly to the hardware (hello svgalib) will most likely not work anyway on modern hardware ... take care, Gerd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
