Re: Running ldconfig after the RPM transaction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Dan Čermák:

> it has been recently proposed to switch openSUSE to run ldconfig via a
> %transfiletriggerin/-un scriptlet instead of manually in %post & %postun
> the same way as Fedora does it at the moment.
>
> However, an interesting issue has been raised: what happens if package A
> gets upgraded in the same transaction as package B, but B needs A during
> the upgrade. A will install a new shared library, but ldconfig will run
> after B has already tried to upgrade.

Fedora ships the soname links in the package, addressing this issue.
For example, openssl-libs contains:

/usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.1
/usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.1.1k
/usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.1
/usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.1.1k

As a result, running ldconfig is purely an optimization.

There are some packages that install fails into /etc/ld.so.conf.d, and
such packages still have to run ldconfig explicitly.  (We should perhaps
move those shared objects to /usr/lib64, too.)

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux