On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 10:48 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 11:41:41 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > > Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I think this was a mistake. > > > We shouldn't have approved a bot that packages snapshot commits for > > > rawhide. In the discussion, we talked about load on the infra, and ability > > > to contact the maintainers, and even cooperation withb packit, but somehow > > > the question whether we want this at all didn't come up. > > > > > > I guess the effort to make rawhide palatable hadn't really sunk in > > > deep enough back then ;) > > > > Well, it's still not clear to me if these builds are not suitable for > > rawhide, or if the bot that is pushing them just has bugs. > > A few podman updates have now caused major breakages for users even in > stable releases. Here's a recent example: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fc15685f73 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1958546 > https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/10274 Well, this at least we can do something about fairly easily. We have an openQA podman test already (a pair of tests actually), which check podman can pull from the registry, then build a basic image which runs a web server, run a container with that image, and test the web server is reachable. We'd only been running those on IoT and CoreOS images, but there's no reason we can't run them in other contexts too. So as of now they will also run on critpath updates and any non- critpath updates containing podman, containernetworking-plugins, crun, fuse-overlayfs or slirp4netns (other suggestions welcome): https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/os-autoinst-distri-fedora/c/9174472 https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedora_openqa/c/d861f94 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/podman/pull-request/43 is a PR which would cause updates for podman for F33 and F34 to be gated on those tests. We could do the same for the other packages easily, I just filed one PR for now to see what the feedback will be. The tests at present don't exercise the toolbox container at all, but it'd be fairly easy to add that if it's a good idea. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
