> Am 25.05.2021 um 23:33 schrieb przemek klosowski via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
>
> On 5/25/21 5:04 PM, Peter Boy wrote:
>>> So the same model works totally fine for both desktop and server.
>>>
>> I myself lack the exact technical knowledge, but (all?) server and file system experts I hear consider just that a gross misconception.
>>
> I think you and Neal talk about two different things. The BTRFS proponents claim that the subvolume technology allows you to have flexible partitioning, so that you can dynamically create whatever partition layout is appropriate for your situation. Nobody is claiming that desktop partition scheme ('model') should be forced onto servers.
Yes, you are right. It’s not about the konkrete partition scheme but the rationale behind it. As a server admin, I'm all about stability, taking precautions in case of errors, recovery, less about flexibility. On my workstation, flexibility is a high priority.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
